Skip to main content
Log in

Administrative clientelism and policy reform failure: the Western Canada Integrated Land Management experience 1990–2015

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Politica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Policy scholars can learn a great deal from students of clientelism with respect to the forces at work in the policy process. This is apparent, for example, with respect to scholarship in recent years which has focused attention on the idea of replacing patchworks of public policies in specific issue areas with more coordinated or ‘integrated’ policy strategies (IS). In theory, such strategies should display a judicious mix of policy goals and means which can produce policy outcomes matched to specific large-scale problem contexts. Empirical work on such strategies, however, has shown the resilience of pre-existing policy elements often leading to reform failures and/or sub-optimal outcomes from such efforts. This article examines a case study of large-scale policy reform efforts in the area of Integrated Land Management (ILM) in Western Canada which reveals the role played by policy clientelism in blocking efforts to enhance policy integration in this area. This finding is significant in pointing out more generally the role played by clientelism in preventing successful policy reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The role of the Commission was gradually reduced until it was replaced in 1995 as part of a general retreat from shared decision-making, when a powerful new central agency, the Land Use Coordination Office (LUCO) gain attempted to impose some order on an increasingly disorganized regime.

References

  • Atkinson, Michael, and William Coleman. 1989a. The State, Business and Industrial Development in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Michael, and William Coleman. 1989b. Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks in Advanced Capitalist Economies. British Journal of Political Science 19 (1): 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bode, I. 2006. Disorganized Welfare Mixes: Voluntary Agencies and New Governance Regimes in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 16 (4): 346–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, Mark, Paul ‘t Hart, and B. Guy Peters (eds.). 2001. Success and Failure in Public Governance. A Comparative Analysi. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressers, H., and T. de Bruijn. 2005. Conditions for the Success of Negotiated Partnerships for Environmental Improvement in the Netherlands. Business Strategy and the Environment 14: 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briassoulis, H. 2005a. Analysis of Policy Integration: Conceptual and Methodological Consideration. In Policy Integration for Complex Environmental Problems: The Example of Mediterranean Desertification, ed. H. Briassoulis, 50–80. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briassoulis, H. 2005b. Complex Environment Problems and the Quest of Policy Integration. In Policy Integration for Complex Environmental Problems: The Example of Mediterranean Desertification, ed. H. Briassoulis. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, Martin. 2007. The Western Australian Regional Forest Agreement: Economic Rationalism and the Normalisation of Political Closure. The Australian Journal of Public Administration 66 (2): 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, Giliberto. Reconceptualizing Layering. From Mode of Institutional Change to Mode of Institutional Design: Types and Outputs. Public Administration 0, no. ja. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12583. Accessed 5 Jan 2019.

  • Cashore, Benjamin, George Hoberg, Michael Howlett, Jeremy Rayner and Jeremy Wilson. 2001. In Search of Sustainability: British Columbia Forest Policy in the 1990s. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

  • Christiansen, T., and S. Piattoni (eds.). 2003. Informal governance in the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demulder, B., and W. Thorp. 2007. Integrated Landscape Management: Moving Forward, 2003–2007. Edmonton: Alberta Chamber of Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, K., and M. Kousis (eds.). 2001. Environmental Politics in Southern Europe: Actors, Institutions and Discourses in a Europeanising Society. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, Daniel, Steve Kennet, Monique Ross, Brad Stelfox, and Marian Weber. 2004. Al-Pac Case Study Report – Part 2, Regulatory Barriers and Options. Prepared for the NRTEE. Calgary: Canadian Institute for Resource Law. https://ilm.law.uvic.ca/PDF/alpaccasestudy2.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2019.

  • Government of Alberta. 2008. Final Land Use Framework. Edmonton (Online at https://www.landuse.alberta.ca/documents/Final_Land_use_Framework.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2009.

  • Grabosky, P.N. 1994. Green Markets: Environmental Regulation by the Private Sector. Law and Policy. 16 (4): 419–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabosky, Paul. 1995. Counterproductive Regulation. International Journal of the Sociology of Law. 23: 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guenette, Sylvie, and Jackie Alder. 2007. Lessons from Marine Protected Areas and Integrated Ocean Management Initiatives in Canada. Coastal Management 33: 51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J.S. 2005. Policy Drift: The Hidden Politics of US Welfare State Retrenchment. In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, ed. W. Streek and K. Thelen, 40–82. Press: Oxford, Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, K., and D. Scott Slocombe. 2007. Integrated Resource and Environmental Management: Concepts and Practice. Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., and J. Rayner. 2006a. Globalization and Governance Capacity: Explaining Divergence in National Forest Programmes as Instances of "Next-Generation" Regulation in Canada and Europe. Governance 19 (2): 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, Michael, and Jeremy Rayner. 2006b. Convergence and Divergence in ‘New Governance’ Arrangements: Evidence from European Integrated Natural Resource Strategies. Journal of Public Policy 26 (2): 167–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Tony, and John Curry. 2004. Peace in the Woods: Sustainability and the Democratization of Land Use Planning and Resource Management on Crown Lands in British Columbia. International Planning Studies 9 (1): 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, S. A. 2004. Integrated Landscape Management in Canada: Initial Overview and Analytical Framework. Calgary.

  • Kennett, Steven A. 2006. Integrated Landscape Management in Canada: Getting from Here to There, 17. Calgary: Canadian Institute of Resources Law, Occasional Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, S., and R. Schneider. 2008. Making It Real: Implementing Alberta’s Land Use Framework. Edmonton: Pembina Institute and Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keysar, E. 2005. Procedural Integration in Support of Environmental Policy Objectives: Implementing Sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 48 (4): 549–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckert, M.K. 2005. In Search of Optimal Institutions for Sustainable Forest Management: Lessons from Developed and Developing Countries. In Institutions, Sustainability and Natural Resources, ed. S. Kant and R.A. Berry. Amsterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackendrick, Norah, Colette Fluet, Debra J. Davidson, Naomi Krogman, and Monique Ross. 2002. Integrated Resource Management in Alberta’s Boreal Forest: Opportunities and Constraints. Interim Project Report. Edmonton: Sustainable Forest Management Network. https://ilm.law.uvic.ca/resources/index.htm. Accessed 3 Jan 2009.

  • NRTEE [National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy]. 2005. Boreal Futures: Governance, Conservation and Development in Canada’s Boreal. Ottawa. Renouf. https://nrt-trn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/boreal-futures-eng.pdf Accessed 20 Feb 2019.

  • Pratt, Larry, and Ian Urquhart. 1994. The Last Great Forest: Japanese Multinationals and Alberta’s Northern Forests. Edmonton: NewWest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan Environment. 1995. A Framework for Integrated Land and Resource Management Planning

  • Scrase, J.I., and W.R. Sheate. 2002. Integration and Integrated Approaches to Assessment: What Do They Mean for the Environment. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 4 (1): 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, Brian, and Tim Stojanovic. 2007. Facts, Fictions and Failures in Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Europe. Coastal Management 35: 375–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead, D., H. Geerlings, et al. (eds.). 2004. Policy Integration in Practice: The Integration of Land Use Planning, Transport and Environmental Policy-Making in Denmark, England and Germany. Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. R. G. 2003. Legal and Institutional Responses to Conflicts Involving Agricultural Development and the Protection of Biodiversity on Forested Public Lands of Northern Alberta. Edmonton.

  • Wilson, Jeremy. 1998. Talk and Log: Wilderness Politics in British Columbia. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C.A. 2000. Policy Regimes and Policy Change. Journal of Public Policy 20 (3): 247–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witter, J.V., H.T.C. Stokkom, and G. Hendriksen. 2006. From River Management to River Basin Management: A Water manager's Perspective. Hydrobiologia 565: 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Howlett.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howlett, M., Rayner, J. Administrative clientelism and policy reform failure: the Western Canada Integrated Land Management experience 1990–2015. Acta Polit 56, 622–638 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00158-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00158-4

Keywords

Navigation